Pupil Protect

Pupil Protect Insight

Your whole trust’s safeguarding, in counts.

Insight brings together the figures from every school’s Pupil Protect: concerns, plans, overdue actions and compliance. It never shows a pupil’s name or what a record says.

For trust safeguarding leads, trustees and governors, and the designated safeguarding lead (DSL) in each school.

Trust overview, example figuresInsight
Concerns logged1,90629.7 per 100 pupils
Child protection plans47and 96 child in need
Overdue actions3114 at one school
Staff policy confirmations94%51 staff outstanding
Online safetyUp at 6 of 8 schools, mostly Years 7 and 8Up 38%
Child-on-child abuseDown at 5 of 8 schoolsDown 12%

Counts only. Numbers under 5 are shown as “fewer than 5”, and no one in Insight can open a pupil’s record.

Every school on one page

Compare schools fairly, per 100 pupils, and see which ones need a hand. Open a school to see why it stands out and arrange a support visit.

  • Measures that show how safeguarding is runConcerns per 100 pupils, child protection, child in need and looked-after numbers, overdue actions, and how quickly urgent concerns are opened.
  • Updated every morningFigures come from each school’s own Pupil Protect, so nobody fills in a return.
Schools, autumn term to date, example figures
SchoolPer 100OverdueUrgent read in 15 minStatus
Northfield Academy34.8494%On track
Riverside High27.31471%Review
Westbrook Academy30.7396%On track
Meadow Lane Primary35.9588%To watch
Oakfield Primary40.02100%On track
ReviewRiverside High14 overdue actions against a trust average of 3.9, and 71% of urgent concerns opened within 15 minutes. The DSL post was vacant for three weeks in September.
Arrange support visit

Trends that compare like with like

Each term is compared at the same point, so six weeks into this autumn lines up with six weeks into last autumn. Filter by phase, school and reporting group.

  • Notable changes, not noiseInsight points out changes of 15% or more, and only where both terms have at least 10 concerns.
  • Read with careA rise isn’t always bad news. It can mean staff are noticing and reporting more.
  • A summary you check firstAI can draft a plain-English summary from the counts on the page, never from records. Nothing is shared until you add it to a report.
Concerns by reporting group, weeks 1 to 6, example figures
Autumn 2026Autumn 2025
WelfareUp 7%248231
Mental healthUp 21%212175
AttendanceUp 19%156131
Child-on-child abuseDown 12%88100
AI summary, draft. Check before sharing

Mental health concerns are up 21% on the same point last autumn, with the largest rise at one secondary school. Child-on-child abuse is down 12%.

Prevent and exploitation numbers are under 5 at most schools, so they’re hidden and shouldn’t be compared school to school.

Drafted from the trust-wide counts on this page, not from any records. Not shared with anyone.Add to board report draftDismiss

Compliance across every school

The single central record, staff confirming they’ve read Keeping children safe in education, DSL training, policy reviews, filtering and monitoring, the annual audit and governor visits. Each shown as met, due or overdue, with the person who owns it.

Compliance, autumn term, exampleRemind 2 schools with overdue items
SchoolSingle central recordKCSIE confirmedDSL Level 3Policies reviewedGovernor visit
Northfield AcademyMetMetMetMetMet
Riverside HighOverdue 7 checksOverdue 88%Overdue new DSLDue 31 OctOverdue
Westbrook AcademyDue 2 DBS pendingMetMetMetDue booked
Oakfield PrimaryMetMetMetMetMet

Reminders go to the person who owns each item and their headteacher, after you confirm. Every reminder is logged.

Board reports in an afternoon, not a week

Choose the sections, check the preview and export a PDF for trustees. Save your choices as a template for next term.

Sections on allegations and low-level concerns about staff are counts only, by school. A section on AI shows how often suggestions were accepted, edited or dismissed across the trust.

Board report, autumn term, example
  • Trust summary
  • School-by-school
  • What’s changing
  • Compliance
  • Schools needing support
  • Allegations and low-level concerns
  • Use of AI tools
Safeguarding report to the trust boardNorthfield Learning Trust, autumn term 2026Trust summary1,906 concerns this term across 8 schools (29.7 per 100 pupils). 47 children on child protection plans and 96 on child in need plans.Schools needing supportRiverside High: support visit arranged following a DSL vacancy. Overdue actions to be cleared by half-term.
Save as templateExport PDF

Counts, never names

Insight is built so a trust can see patterns without anyone outside a school seeing a child. Small numbers are hidden, because in a small school a small number can point to one pupil.

Reporting group by school, example
GroupOakfieldHillcrestTrust
Welfare4117248
ExploitationFewer than 5Fewer than 523
PreventFewer than 5Fewer than 59
  • No names, no record contentInsight holds counts. Nobody in Insight can open a pupil’s record or read what a concern says.
  • Numbers under 5 are hiddenThey’re shown as “fewer than 5” everywhere: on screen, in exports and in board reports.
  • Small numbers aren’t comparedChanges are only pointed out when both terms have enough concerns to mean something.
  • The AI sees counts tooSummaries are drafted from the figures on the page. A person checks them before they go anywhere.
  • Every export is loggedYou confirm before a board pack or export is created, and the trust can see who made it and when.

See it with your own trust in mind.

A 30-minute demo shaped around your questions and what your board asks for today.